Anterior knee pain
- Anterior Knee Pain is a symptom not a diagnosis! The term simply means ‘pain at the front of the knee’.
- There are many different potential causes of anterior knee pain.
- Before even thinking about any kind of actual treatment for your knee, the first step is to get a clear and definite diagnosis as to what the underlying cause(s) of your pain might actually be.
- Thorough and complete investigation of anterior knee pain must include seeing an appropriate specialist, having the specialist taking a full and detailed history and performing a proper clinical examination, followed by whatever potential imaging might be required.
- The best imaging for checking the shape and position of the kneecap as it sits in the groove at the front of the knee is X-rays, but importantly these must include a special angled view called a patellar skyline view.
- The best imaging for checking the cartilage in the patellofemoral joint and for checking all of the deeper structures in the knee is an MRI scan.
- The best imaging for checking the superficial soft tissues at the front of the knee (and looking for patellar tendonitis, bursitis or fat pad inflammation) is an ultrasound scan. Ultrasound is particularly useful, as if specific areas of inflammation are seen then sometimes these can be injected with cortisone, then and there, under ultrasound guidance.
- If your pain at the front of your knee is not too bad then seeing a physio and having an assessment plus treatments is a good thing to do. If your pain is more severe or if it’s been there a while and it’s not getting better, or if it’s not responding to physio treatments, then get it checked specifically by a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon who specializes in knees (not just a generalist).
First and foremost — this is a symptom, not a diagnosis!
‘Anterior knee pain’ simply means ‘pain around the front of the knee’. Nothing more than that. There are numerous different potential causes of anterior knee pain, and the first and most important step is to work out exactly what the actual diagnosis is before one can then formulate an appropriate treatment plan … and potential surgical treatment comes way down the line.
One of the most important initial things is to specific very precisely exactly where the site of the symptoms is, and correlating this to the underlying anatomy normally cuts down the differential diagnosis (the list of possible causes) significantly.
Pain that can be pinpointed quite specifically to the area just below the kneecap can be due to:-
– Patellar tendinopathy (patellar tendonitis or tendinosis)
– Fat pad inflammation
– Infrapatellar bursitis
– Osgood Schlatter’s Disease / ossicles
Articular cartilage damage in the patellofemoral joint
– Patellar maltracking
– Patellar instability
– Pre-patellar bursitis
Medial Plica Syndrome
– Medial meniscal tears
– Articular cartilage damage to the medial femoral condyle
– Lateral Plica Syndrome (not common)
– Lateral meniscal tears
– Articular cartilage damage to the lateral femoral condyle
It is vital that any significant symptoms in your knee are actually diagnosed correctly, and for this it is important to see an appropriate specialist who will take a detailed history, perform a clinical examination and arrange whatever imaging investigations might be required.
What potentially might be going on under the skin and behind the kneecap at the front of the knee very often has no relation to whatever the superficial appearances of the front of the knee might be, from just visual inspection. Proper detailed imaging is of particular importance when trying to make an accurate and reliable diagnosis of the underlying cause of a patient’s anterior knee pain.
The best way to look for arthritis in the knee is with a good old fashioned X-ray. However, X-ray is also the best way of looking at the exact shape of the patellofemoral joint and of determining the degree of any potential patellar maltracking that might be present. In particular, special views of the knee looking from the bottom upwards with the knee slightly bent (called a patellar skyline view) are especially useful.
The best test for looking for problems with the muscles, tendons and soft tissues at the front of the knee is ultrasound. Just like a pregnancy scan, ultrasound is performed by passing a probe over the knee with jelly on the skin. The scan is performed by a Consultant Radiologist (X-ray doctor), and is highly operator-dependent. With X-rays and MRI, it is the actual images that I personally want to see, not such a typed report. However, with ultrasound the images (which tend to be just a series of grey lines) have little meaning, and it is actually the radiologist’s report on the scan that’s important.
Ultrasound is particularly sensitive and accurate for diagnosing conditions such as bursitis, tendinopathy and muscle/tendon tears. At the same time, with ultrasound, if a specific area of inflammation is found (for example fat pad inflammation or inflammation under the distal ITB from ITB Friction Syndrome) then an ultrasound-guided steroid/cortisone injection can be given by the radiologist doing the scan. Ultrasound-guided injections are far more accurate than just ‘blind’ injection in clinic, and is the gold standard for many specific conditions.
If damage deeper inside the joint is suspected, such as damage to the articular cartilage, to the meniscal cartilages or to any of the deeper ligaments, then the best imaging modality by far is MRI. Having an MRI scan involves lying on a bed that goes part way into a large tunnel. Having the scan takes about 20 minutes and can potentially feel a bit claustrophobic, plus it is important to keep the knee very still during this period as any movement will cause blurring of the images.
In my practice, if I send a patient for an MRI scan then it is the actual images that I want to see, as I will go through all of these in detail, correlating any potential findings with the patient’s actual history, symptoms and clinical signs. MRI scans are about 90+% accurate, which means that they can sometimes miss some smaller things, with a small potential false +ve and false –ve rate. Just having an MRI report only, without reviewing the actual images, is really not sufficient. I like to go through the actual MRI images with my patients in clinic after any scan, using this as an opportunity to explain to the patient the anatomy in the knee and any potential damage that might show up, as this aids enormously with most people’s understanding of what is actually happening with their knee.